Comments on: 四大天王 - 疑幻似真的樂壇真人 show http://jacky.seezone.net/2006/04/21/1617/ Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:21:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: 香港國際電影節網上筆記連線 http://jacky.seezone.net/2006/04/21/1617/#comment-2128 香港國際電影節網上筆記連線 Thu, 18 May 2006 11:21:54 +0000 http://jacky.seezone.net/2006/04/21/1617/#comment-2128 四大天王 The Heavenly Kings (吳彥祖, 2006) 疑幻似真的樂壇真人show 只可惜 Alive 這種手段，與現在傳媒手法同出一徹，結果只是「大家累鬥累」，卻無甚建設性。反映了現實，卻也無可奈何繼續在不公平的遊戲裏繼續遵守遊戲規則。(&#... 四大天王 The Heavenly Kings (吳彥祖, 2006)

疑幻似真的樂壇真人show
只可惜 Alive 這種手段，與現在傳媒手法同出一徹，結果只是「大家累鬥累」，卻無甚建設性。反映了現實，卻也無可奈何繼續在不公平的遊戲裏繼續遵守遊戲規則。(&#…

]]> By: Jacky http://jacky.seezone.net/2006/04/21/1617/#comment-1992 Jacky Tue, 25 Apr 2006 14:58:03 +0000 http://jacky.seezone.net/2006/04/21/1617/#comment-1992 DRM 方面，其實我也不知道有甚麼好方法，但以用戶角度，我認為 DRM 一定要方便，不會令人覺得使用上很不方便，否則用戶還是會轉投「地下」市場 方便的意思，應包括： 1. 將歌曲移動(抄？)到不同的播放器 2. 可以備份 另外，賣歌系統也必需要方便用戶，想想香港人十幾元一首 mp3 鈴聲也肯買，所以市場是有的。只要賣歌系統，可以比自己非法下載和跟朋友取得方便的話，便有機會吸引人使用，始終人是懶和貪方便的。另外，賣歌系統也最好可以提供一些貼身的用戶向設計，如記錄用戶的音樂偏好，通知用戶他有興趣的新歌。又可加入社會性元素，組成社群，分享聽歌的心得等等，就可以成功留住用戶。 當然，講得容易，實行上無論是技術和複雜程度，都應該會很難 > "DRM is only good for rental model." 以現在 DRM 的設計，也只是租用比較合適，但是否有人肯租，又是另一回事 DRM 方面，其實我也不知道有甚麼好方法，但以用戶角度，我認為 DRM 一定要方便，不會令人覺得使用上很不方便，否則用戶還是會轉投「地下」市場

方便的意思，應包括：
1. 將歌曲移動(抄？)到不同的播放器
2. 可以備份

另外，賣歌系統也必需要方便用戶，想想香港人十幾元一首 mp3 鈴聲也肯買，所以市場是有的。只要賣歌系統，可以比自己非法下載和跟朋友取得方便的話，便有機會吸引人使用，始終人是懶和貪方便的。另外，賣歌系統也最好可以提供一些貼身的用戶向設計，如記錄用戶的音樂偏好，通知用戶他有興趣的新歌。又可加入社會性元素，組成社群，分享聽歌的心得等等，就可以成功留住用戶。

當然，講得容易，實行上無論是技術和複雜程度，都應該會很難

> “DRM is only good for rental model.”
以現在 DRM 的設計，也只是租用比較合適，但是否有人肯租，又是另一回事

]]> By: Lindsay http://jacky.seezone.net/2006/04/21/1617/#comment-1987 Lindsay Tue, 25 Apr 2006 11:19:52 +0000 http://jacky.seezone.net/2006/04/21/1617/#comment-1987 This is a problem too difficult to tackle. As you mentioned there are increasing number of non-compatible DRM systems in the market. Before ISO come up with a file format for multimedia contents that support a standarized DRM scheme, this will continue to be a problem. A lot of wireless carriers now stuggle to choose between using OMA standard and Microsoft DRM standard, Microsoft is proprietary and OMA is expensive. Despite all this, content owners should find a way to protect their content offered on the web, even if this is free of charge for download. DRM can be used to offer play count or usage duration for this content. The benefit is DRM protected content can be distributed over P2P networks, but users still need to get authorization to play the content. This can provide a way for content owners to track content usage effectively and design a good compensation scheme for their work. Again, this is not an ideal solution for users. But do you think everyone will behave properly if there is a day labels start to offer content in unprotected MP3 formats? Due to technology issues, DRM is only good for rental model. Just my humble opinion. This is a problem too difficult to tackle. As you mentioned there are increasing number of non-compatible DRM systems in the market. Before ISO come up with a file format for multimedia contents that support a standarized DRM scheme, this will continue to be a problem.

A lot of wireless carriers now stuggle to choose between using OMA standard and Microsoft DRM standard, Microsoft is proprietary and OMA is expensive. Despite all this, content owners should find a way to protect their content offered on the web, even if this is free of charge for download. DRM can be used to offer play count or usage duration for this content. The benefit is DRM protected content can be distributed over P2P networks, but users still need to get authorization to play the content. This can provide a way for content owners to track content usage effectively and design a good compensation scheme for their work.

Again, this is not an ideal solution for users. But do you think everyone will behave properly if there is a day labels start to offer content in unprotected MP3 formats?

Due to technology issues, DRM is only good for rental model.

Just my humble opinion.

]]> By: Jacky http://jacky.seezone.net/2006/04/21/1617/#comment-1985 Jacky Tue, 25 Apr 2006 09:49:00 +0000 http://jacky.seezone.net/2006/04/21/1617/#comment-1985 那你覺得 DRM 要怎樣行才好呢？ 那你覺得 DRM 要怎樣行才好呢？

]]> By: Lindsay http://jacky.seezone.net/2006/04/21/1617/#comment-1984 Lindsay Tue, 25 Apr 2006 09:43:42 +0000 http://jacky.seezone.net/2006/04/21/1617/#comment-1984 I think when artist become famous, they will tend to use DRM protection for their creations. I agree DRM may not be a good solution but if there is no DRM, there is a problem. I think when artist become famous, they will tend to use DRM protection for their creations. I agree DRM may not be a good solution but if there is no DRM, there is a problem.

]]>