<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 野心蠻大的 Open Social？</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jacky.seezone.net/2007/11/05/1893/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jacky.seezone.net/2007/11/05/1893/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 枯の灵</title>
		<link>http://jacky.seezone.net/2007/11/05/1893/#comment-6018</link>
		<dc:creator>枯の灵</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 05:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacky.seezone.net/2007/11/05/1893/#comment-6018</guid>
		<description>Open Social 並不是真的 Open，只是「不限死在一個平台」的開放形式而已。

嗯

总结得不错</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Open Social 並不是真的 Open，只是「不限死在一個平台」的開放形式而已。</p>
<p>嗯</p>
<p>总结得不错</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annie Yau</title>
		<link>http://jacky.seezone.net/2007/11/05/1893/#comment-5322</link>
		<dc:creator>Annie Yau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 05:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacky.seezone.net/2007/11/05/1893/#comment-5322</guid>
		<description>Dear Jacky,
你好, 我是香港電台傳媒春秋編導, 有些事想請教, 煩請覆 23397644, 謝!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Jacky,<br />
你好, 我是香港電台傳媒春秋編導, 有些事想請教, 煩請覆 23397644, 謝!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix</title>
		<link>http://jacky.seezone.net/2007/11/05/1893/#comment-5309</link>
		<dc:creator>Felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 01:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jacky.seezone.net/2007/11/05/1893/#comment-5309</guid>
		<description>The best way is to have Open Social go completely open source, and release the maintainence role to the public. Yet, given that they had put resources to back the standard, in marketing and research, I doubt the chance of Google going really open.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best way is to have Open Social go completely open source, and release the maintainence role to the public. Yet, given that they had put resources to back the standard, in marketing and research, I doubt the chance of Google going really open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
